🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion say that indecision on how best to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the situation details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their last home, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see people’s bones,” she said. “Certain people hold this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will collect remains as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that befell at Eccles will occur here and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her child's grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Solutions and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families are calling for additional sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow burials to proceed for now. Others contend the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is down to them to decide the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that process with communities.”

He added there was ample time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a spiritual perspective on the temporal loss of sacred ground.